翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Hawaii gubernatorial election, 1986 ・ Hawaii gubernatorial election, 1990 ・ Hawaii gubernatorial election, 1994 ・ Hawaii gubernatorial election, 1998 ・ Hawaii gubernatorial election, 2002 ・ Hawaii gubernatorial election, 2006 ・ Hawaii gubernatorial election, 2010 ・ Hawaii gubernatorial election, 2014 ・ Hawaii Hammerheads ・ Hawaii Health Connector ・ Hawaii High School Athletic Association ・ Hawaii Hochi ・ Hawaii hotspot ・ Hawaii House Bill 444 ・ Hawaii House of Representatives ・ Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff ・ Hawaii Independence Party ・ Hawaii Inter-Island Cable System ・ Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals ・ Hawaii International Conference on Education ・ Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences ・ Hawaii International Film Festival ・ Hawaii Island Journal ・ Hawaii Islanders ・ Hawaii Kai, Hawaii ・ Hawaii Kotohira Jinsha – Hawaii Dazaifu Tenmangu ・ Hawaii Land Court ・ Hawaii Life ・ Hawaii Loa College ・ Hawaii locations by per capita income Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff ： ウィキペディア英語版 Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff ''Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff'', 467 U.S. 229 (1984), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a state could use the eminent domain process to take land overwhelmingly concentrated in the hands of private landowners and redistribute it to the wider population of private residents. == Background == With 22 landowners owning 72.5% of the fee simple titles in the island of Oahu, the Hawaii Legislature concluded that this was an oligopoly in land ownership and it was “skewing the State's residential fee simple market, inflating land prices, and injuring the public tranquility and welfare.” However, the shortage of buildable land on Oahu was due in large measure to the fact that roughly half the island is government-owned and thus unavailable for privately owned housing. The Hawaii legislature enacted a condemnation scheme intended to transfer titles to these lots from its owner (the Bishop Estate) to the home lessees. The case focused on the taking of land held by the Bishop Estate, a charitable trust that held the residual lands of the Hawaiian monarchy, and used the proceeds to support the Kamehameha schools that provide an education to Hawaiian children. The Bishop Estate had subdivided some of its land on Oahu, and leased individual lots to land lessees who built homes on them, at first paying nominal rents to the estate. But eventually, as Oahu land values rose (as did rents) the tenants demanded that the state acquire the Estate's title and reconvey title to the individual lots to the lessee-homeowners who would have to pay fair market value to reimburse the State for the acquisition. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.